Recently I came across a movie on this theme and a moving story in a book called “The Secret Life of Albert Entwistle” by Matt Cainon, illustrating ‘love’ between two boys, who are presently in their 50s. The protagonists in both the movie and the book set me thinking. The characters in both cases indicate that, one, ‘love’ is a matter of choice, and, two, that is how ‘these’ people seem to be made. Recorded history in terms of ancient texts, pre-historic paintings, temple arts also depict such behavior in humans in the past. There have been recorded instances of animals exhibiting similar behavior in real life. But, that seems to be more of an aberration than a norm. Going through both of these narratives however made me realize that this behaviour is real and not ‘imagined’ i.e. it is not that the characters indulge in such kind of behaviour due to lack of opportunity or any other external compulsion. It is something very basic and primordial, which, I did not use to believe ...
“Science is science and art is art and the twain shall never meet” to rephrase a quote by Rudyard Kipling (1889) Science and art are distinct academic disciplines with distinguishing features, that can help one classify any work as science or art. The use of the phrase ‘state of art’ implies something under consideration being so revolutionary that it cannot be classified as science as of now and is in the state of art. Over a period of time, with repeated implementation of the same, a certain methodology, set of rules, standard operating procedures etc. may be developed and it enters the realm of science. That implies that what is taken as science today was art at some point of time earlier in its development. In this blog, we look at a work of art that fits in the subject of Linear Programming Problem (LPP) that is taught in Operations Research or Management Science or Decision Science. The poem itself is as follows: The three princes of Serendip Went on a little trip. They c...
The history is written by the winners, it is said and if there are different winners at different points of time then there are different histories, and, then what is the history we are going to teach the kids in school, presently. Such, is the dilemma in which we find ourselves at this point of time. Times are changing fast and so is the technology. What do any of the religious texts, one believes in have to say for that… The use of mobiles/ laptops/ printers for example - Is it ‘haram’ for muslims, or a part of idol worship for Hindus or a copy of Guru Granth Sahib for Sikhs, for that matter. One can think of numerous examples, and, I will leave it to the readers’ imagination to think of so called ‘paradoxes’. The wearing of ‘hijab’ was dictated by the society at that time due to some social complexities. But, do all the muslims in all the countries of the world wear hijab; that is the larger question? The reason Hindus have 33 million Gods, is a case in the point. If one COULD NOT ...
Comments
Post a Comment